Writ petition seeking CBI take-over in a criminal case alleging improper investigation was disposed of as no specific instance of malpractice was disclosed.
Petition for CBI take-over dismissed; petitioner to approach concerned court of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.) No. 04 of 2022
Jaymanti Khalkho … Petitioner
-Versus-
… Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shivam Utkarsh Sahay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ravi Prakash Mishra, A.C. to A.A.G.-II For the CBI : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate
Mr. Ravi Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for the State and Mr. P.A.S. Pati, learned counsel for the CBI.
-2-
disclosed in the counter affidavit. He further submits that the charge-sheet is submitted under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. He submits that proper investigation is there.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
Ajay/
Jaymanti Khalkho
The State of Jharkhand
The Director General of Police, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Palamau
The Superintendent of Police, Latehar
The Director, Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
