The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a notice under the UAPA to file a reply regarding property seizure. The State had no objection. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
W.P.(Cr.) No.20 of 2018
----
Khuleshwar Gope @ Khileshwar Gope, age 37 years, son of Shri Chandra Mohan Gope, resident of 4D, Brij Veena Apartment, Itki Road, Hehal, P.O. Hehal, P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District-Ranchi .... Petitioner
-- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand and Others .... Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Vikram Nath Shahdeo, Advocate Mr. Abhishek Sinha, Advocate For the State :- Ms. Surabhi, Advocate ----
5 /02.05.2023 This petition has been filed for quashing of the notice dated
15.12.2017 whereby the petitioner has been called upon to file reply to
the show cause as to why the property of the petitioner be not seized under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.
respondent State has got no objection for the same.
liberty.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
SI/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Khuleshwar Gope @ Khileshwar Gope
The State of Jharkhand
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
