The High Court stayed the execution of a process issued under Section 82 Cr.P.C. pending the disposal of a pending anticipatory bail petition, while disposing of the quashing petition.
Execution of process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. put in abeyance till disposal of anticipatory bail ABA No. 10669 of 2022; Cr. M.P. disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 170 of 2023
Rahul Singh @ Rahul Ranjan Singh … …. Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … …. Opp. Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
----For the Petitioner : Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. -----
Oral Order 05 / Dated : 15.02.2023
In view of the fact that the petitioner had submitted to the authority of the court by filing ABA No. 10669 of 2022, before issuance of the process under Section 82 Cr.P.C. Therefore, the execution of process issued by the court below is put in abeyance till disposal of the anticipatory bail by this Court.
Instant Cr. Misc. Petition is accordingly disposed of.
Let this order be communicated through FAX to the court below at the cost
of the petitioner.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )
AKT
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the execution of process issued under Section 82 Cr.P.C. should be stayed pending disposal of the anticipatory bail petition filed by the petitioner.
Whether the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition for quashing the lower order should be disposed of on the facts presented.
6 provisions across 3 enactments
Rahul Singh @ Rahul Ranjan Singh
State of Jharkhand
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
