Single-judge order rejecting petitioners bail prayer in POCSO and sexual offence case, refusing enlargement due to allegation nature.
Bail prayer rejected; petitioner may renew prayer after six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 8728 of 2023
Satender Singh @ Satendra Kumar Singh @ Satendra Kumar ----Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ----Opp. Party
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
For the Petitioner: Mr. Deepak Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the O.P-State: Ms. Amrita Kumari, A.P.P.
04 / 02.11.2023 Heard the parties.
Petitioner, if so advised, may renew his prayer for bail after six months.
(Ambuj Nath, J)
Ranjeet/
Uploaded
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant bail to the petitioner accused of offences under Section 354A of IPC and Section 12 of POCSO Act.
Satender Singh @ Satendra Kumar Singh @ Satendra Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
