Allowed

Pratap Ganjhu Alias Mahadeo Ganjhu v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC9 Oct 2023B.A./8388/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi granted regular bail to the applicant in a bail application filed under Balumath P.S. Case No. 86 of 2022 concerning offences under Sections 385, 386, and 387 IPC, after considering arguments from both sides.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is directed to be released on bail by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each, along with specified conditions.

Pratap Ganjhu Alias Mahadeo Ganjhu Vs the State of Jharkhand — Bail and Remand | Jharkhand HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8388 of 2023

¶2

---Pratap Ganjhu @ Mahadeo Ganjhu …. …. Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand …. …. Opposite Party

¶3

---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR

¶4

---For the Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s) : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedy, Adv. For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. ----

¶5

03/Dated: 09^th October, 2023

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for the State.

¶7

2. The applicant who is in custody since 26.08.2022 has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.86 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No.641 of 2022, registered for the offence under Sections 385 of 386 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar.

¶8

3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant(s) that complete set of FIR along with its enclosure have been annexed with this bail application and there is no suppression on his/her part.

¶9

4. Innocence has been claimed by the learned counsel for the applicant and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that charge has been framed on 21.12.2022 but till date not a single witness has been examined. Further, one of the co-accused namely Vijay Ganjhu has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 06.04.2023 in B.A. No.905 of 2023. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.

¶10

5. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the above facts, I am inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the applicant, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in connection with Balumath P.S. Case No.86 of 2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No.641 of 2022, subject to condition that the applicant(s) will submit selfattested photocopy/photocopies of his/her/their Aadhaar Card(s) and also submit his/her/their mobile number(s) before the learned court below which he/she/they will always keep active and will not change it during pendency of this case without prior permission of the court.

¶11

(Rajesh Kumar, J.)

¶12

Amar/-

Pratap Ganjhu Alias Mahadeo Ganjhu v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratap Ganjhu Alias Mahadeo Ganjhu v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sirajuddin Khan Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Sarfaraz Vs the State of Jharkhand

Chandradeep Kumar Saw Alias Sao Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Manir Ansari Alias Manir Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Anwar Ali Alias Anwar Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mohammad Tabrez Alam Vs the State of Jharkhand