Meena Kumari v. Badri Prasad
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the CMP after the underlying suit was decided. The Court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Leave granted to withdraw the petition; CMP dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 557 of 2022
-----
Meena Kumari, wife of Shailendra Kumar Garay, aged about 63 years, resident of Laxmi Niwas, Bilasi Town, B- Deoghar, P.O., P.S. & Sub Division Deoghar, District Deoghar. .… … Petitioner
Versus Badri Prasad, son of Late Jagnarayan Sah, resident of Mohalla Castairs, Town Deoghar, P.O., P.S. & District Deoghar, at present residing at S.B. Roy road, Deoghar, P.O. B. Deoghar, P.S., Sub-Division, District Deoghar. … … Opposite Party
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD ------For the Petitioner : Mr. Tarun Kumar Mahato, Advocate
Order No. 04 / Dated 18th September, 2023
Mr. Tarun Kumar Mahato, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, has submitted that since the suit itself has been decided, hence, nothing survives to be decided so far as the order which is impugned in the instant petitioner is concerned, as such, he has sought leave of this Court to withdraw this petition.
Accordingly and considering the aforesaid prayer,
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Meena Kumari
- respondent
Badri Prasad
Coram
Sujit Narayan Prasad
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- C.M.P./557/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court