This anticipatory bail application was disposed of by directing the petitioner to surrender before the court below within two weeks, which must then decide the bail application complying with Supreme Court and High Court guidelines.
Petitioner directed to surrender before the learned court below within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A No. 323 of 2023
Shailendra Kumar ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Moni Kumari ----Opp. Parties --CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ambuj Nath
For the Petitioner: Mr. Manish Yadav, Advocate For the O.P-State: Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2: M/s Manoj Kr. Sah, Puja Kumari, Advocates
(Ambuj Nath, J)
Ranjeet/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application should be disposed of by directing the petitioner to surrender before the courts below.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and AnotherReferred¶9
Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and Another reported in [ (2022) 10 SCC 51] · Who else cites this
Birendra Jha @ Virendra Jha Versus State of JharkhandReferred¶9
Birendra Jha @ Virendra Jha Versus State of Jharkhand reported in [2001 (2) JLJR 76]
Shailendra Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Moni Kumari
Ambuj Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
