The High Court of Jharkhand, on the petition seeking withdrawal to avail alternative legal remedies, dismissed the writ petition noting the respondents had no objection to the withdrawal.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
[Civil Writ Jurisdiction]
W.P.(C ) No. 809 of 2020
Raghunandan Singh .... .. ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Jharkhand Through the Secretary, Deptt. Of Excise and Prohibition & Ors.
.. ... ...Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO (Through :- Video Conferencing) ......... For the Petitioner : Mr. Dipak Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the respondents-State : Mr. Deepankar, AC to AG
06/ 11.03.2022 .
Learned counsel, Mr. Dipak Kumar Sinha on the instruction of learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Abhishek Kumar Srivastava seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition so as to avail legal remedy available under the law Learned counsel for the respondents- State, Mr. Deepankar, AC to AG has no objection.
Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.)
R.S.
Raghunandan Singh
State of Jharkhand
Kailash Prasad Deo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
