The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution after issuing notice to the petitioner, who had failed to appear following the death of his counsel, and vacated the interim order.
Writ petition dismissed; interim order vacated; pending applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W. P. (S) No. 3593 of 2007
Prashant Ranjan … … Petitioner
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY ---
Through Video Conferencing
08/09.02.2022
1. Notice was issued to the petitioner on account of death of counsel for the petitioner through ordinate process on 30.07.2016 and as per office note, notice has been validly served upon the petitioner, but nobody has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner in the present case.
2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution.
3. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is closed as not pressed.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Mukul
Prashant Ranjan
State of Jharkhand
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
