The High Court of Jharkhand permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition as the house had been demolished. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to seek other legal remedies.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No. 1483 of 2018
….....
Dashrath Durga Sahu …. ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO
…......... For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate. For the Respondents/State : Mr. Rahul Saboo, G.P.-II. ........ 06/22.07.2022.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay has submitted, that in view of subsequent development brought on record by the petitioner that house has already been demolished, petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, so as to take legal recourse in the matter.
Learned counsel for the respondents / State, Mr. Rahul Saboo, G.P.-II has no objection.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to avail legal remedy available under the law.
(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.)
Sunil/-
Dashrath Durga Sahu
The State of Jharkhand
Kailash Prasad Deo
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
