Dismissed
Dipu Sao Soni v. the State of Jharkhand
Jharkhand HCWPC/794/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI [Civil Writ…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI [Civil Writ…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI [Civil Writ Jurisdiction] W.P.(C ) No. 794 of 2020
Dipu Sao Soni & Others
Dipu Sao Soni & Others .... .. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .. ... ... Respondents
Versus ...........
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO
......... For the Petitioners : Mr. Jay Prakash Pandey, Advocate For the respondents-State : Mrs. Darshana Poddar Mishra, AAG-I Mr. Awanish Shekhar, Advocate
08/ 21.07.2022 .
Learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Jay Prakash Pandey has submitted that petitioners have preferred this writ petition for direction upon the respondent to fix the rent with regard to the land of Khata No.114, Plot No.1210, Area 0.79 acres situated at Mauza Nyee Param, P.O. & P.S. Tandwa, District Chatra although the land stands recorded in R.R. Khatiyan in the name Kalu Sonar, S/o Late Tikar Sonar and the land in question is belagam.
Learned counsel for the respondents-State, Mrs. Darshana Poddar Mishra, AAG-I assisted by Mr. Awanish Shekhar has submitted that as per the pleading of the petitioners, it was belagam land, so he cannot ask to fix the rent and secondly the petitioners is not in possession of the land rather Block of the Tandwa has been constructed over the land long back and a portion of the same is under possession of the NTPC, as such, State may not be directed to fix the rent. Petitioners may avail the legal remedy available under the law.
Upon which, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr. Jay Prakash Pandey has submitted that petitioners may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition, so as to avail the legal remedy available under the law with regard to their land.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.)
R.S.
Dipu Sao Soni & Others
The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
KAILASH PRASAD DEO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court