S.A. No. 244 of 2004. Appellants failed to appear despite repeated calls. Respondent counsel noted lack of merit. Appeal dismissed for default.
Appeal dismissed for default of the appellants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.A. No. 244 of 2004
Most. Lalita Devi & Ors. .... .... …. Appellants
Smt. Rana Dutta & Ors. .... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Appellant : None For the Respondent : Mr. Awnish Shankar, Advocate
Order No.20 Dated- 20.07.2022
No one turns up on behalf of the appellants in-spite of repeated calls.
The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the appellants are not pursuing the appeal diligently as there is no merit in this appeal.
This appeal is dismissed for default of the appellants.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Sonu-Gunjan/-
Lalita Devi & Ors.
Rana Dutta & Ors.
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
