The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed an appeal for default due to the appellant's failure to appear in spite of repeated calls. The court noted lack of diligent pursuit by the appellant.
Appeal dismissed for default of appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.A. No. 123 of 2001
Khaderan Ram .... .... …. Appellant Versus .... .... Chandradeo Prajapati & Ors. .... Respondents
------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Appellant : None For the Respondents : Mr. Baban Prasad, Advocate
Order No.15 Dated- 20.07.2022
No one turns up on behalf of the appellant in-spite of repeated calls.
The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the appellant is not pursuing the appeal diligently as there is no merit in this appeal.
This appeal is dismissed for default of the appellant.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Sonu-Gunjan/-
Khaderan Ram
Chandradeo Prajapati & Ors.
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
