This is a default order dismissing an appeal in the High Court of Jharkhand because the appellants failed to appear despite repeated calls, while the respondent's counsel argued there was no merit in the appeal.
Appeal dismissed for failure of appellants to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No.24 of 1993 (R)
------
Lochan Mahto & Others .... .... …. Appellants Versus Sadhu Mahto & Others .... .... .... Respondents
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------ For the Appellants : None For the Respondents : Mr. K. K. Ambastha, Advocate ------
Order No.19 Dated- 19/07/2022
Heard the learned counsel for the respondents.
No one turns up on behalf of the appellants in spite of repeated calls.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that as there is no merit in this appeal hence the appellants are not diligent in pursuing this appeal and harassing the respondents by dragging on the litigation.
This appeal is dismissed for the default of the appellants.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Animesh/
LOCHAN MAHTO & OTHERS
SADHU MAHTO & OTHERS
ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
