The High Court at Ranchi dismissed Special Appeal No. 85 of 2004 due to the appellants' default, noting their absence despite repeated calls.
Special Appeal dismissed for default of appellants' non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
S.A. No. 85 of 2004
Ashutosh Mahto & Ors.
.... .... .... Respondents ------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Appellants : None For the Respondents : Mr. Ankit Vishal, Advocate
Order No.18 Dated- 18.07.2022
No one turns up on behalf of the appellants in-spite of repeated calls.
The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the appellants are not pursuing the appeal diligently as there is no merit in this appeal.
This appeal is dismissed for default of the appellants.
Sonu-Gunjan/-
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )
Ashutosh Mahto & Ors.
State
Anil Kumar Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
