This order notes a petition成为了rufruit because the sentence was already complied with and dismissed the application as infructuous.
The instant application is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Revision No. 532 of 2009
Rajesh Ramani & Anr. ..… Petitioners
Versus
The State of Jharkhand. ..... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, APP
06/Dated: 17th November, 2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant application has become infructuous as the sentence passed by the learned appellate court has already been complied with, as such he does not want to press this case.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Amardeep/
Rajesh Ramani & Anr.
The State of Jharkhand
Deepak Roshan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
