Petitioner challenged an order. The learned Single Judge dismissed the petition as infructuous due to the death of the opposite party No. 2, noting the cause of action may survive for future proceedings.
The petition was dismissed as infructuous due to the death of opposite party No. 2.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No. 741 of 2015
Radha Mohan Mishra @ R.M. Mishra ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Md. Murtaza ..... … Opposite Parties --------
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Laik, Advocate. For the State : Ms Nehala Sharmin, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mrs. Rashmi Lal, Advocate.
04/ 12.04.2022 Mrs. Rashmi Lal, leaned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 2, at the outset, submits that during the pendency of this petition, the O.P.
No. 2 has died.
There is no stay in the matter and in view of the further development, it appears that this petition has become infructuous.
As such, this petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, it is open to the petitioner, if the cause of action still survives, he may take all the grounds at the appropriate stage.
Amitesh/-
Radha Mohan Mishra @ R.M. Mishra
The State of Jharkhand
Md. Murtaza
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
