A single-paragraph order wherein the court found that the petitioner had fully complied with a prior order. Consequently, the appellant's counsel's submissions were accepted, and the contempt application was dropped and disposed of.
Contempt application dropped and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 20 of 2020
Padu Mahato
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK
| For the Petitioner | ------ : |
Mr. Niranjan Singha, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the State | : | Mr. Rishi Bharti, AC to AAG-III |
| For the BCCL | : ----- |
Mr. A.K. Mehta, Advocate |
In view of submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, no contempt is made out and hence, it is dropped.
Accordingly, this contempt application stands disposed of.
(Dr. S. N. Pathak, J.)
R.Kr.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a contempt application is maintainable when the underlying order has been fully complied with.
Padu Mahato
State of Jharkhand
M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited and others
S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
