Allowed

Kanhaiya Lal Taleja v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC17 Aug 2022A.B.A./5904/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand allowed an anticipatory bail application. The court was satisfied that partial payment shown no fraudulent intention. Bail was granted subject to surrender, furnishing a bond, and appearing for investigation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; petitioner directed to surrender within two weeks and furnish bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

Kanhaiya Lal Taleja Vs the State of… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Jharkhand HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5904 of 2022

¶2

------

¶3

Kanhaiya Lal Taleja .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Amar Kumar Gupta .... .... .... Opposite Parties

¶4

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶5

For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Priya Shrestha, A.P.P.

¶6

Oral Order

¶7

02/ Dated :17.08.2022

¶8

The anticipatory bail application filed on behalf of petitioner, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Sukhdeonagar P.S. Case No. 194 of 2017 corresponding to G.R. No.1948 of 2017 for the offence registered under Sections 406, 420, 120B of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of Sri Rakesh Ranjan, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Ranchi, is pressed into motion.

¶9

It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner that he is Director of the Company which had taken on lease the premises of the informant for which the present case has been filed. It is also submitted that separate Eviction Suit has been filed by the complainant. The petitioner has not entered into any agreement with the informant rather accused Nos.1 and 2 have entered into agreement.

¶10

Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶11

In view of assertion made in para 5 of the application that part of initial payment of Rupees Five Lakhs has been made which goes to show that there was no intention to defraud the informant since, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender before the learned Trial Court within a period of two weeks and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶12

The petitioner will co-operate in the investigation and will appear under Section 41A Cr.P.C. as and when required and comply with the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶13

(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶14

Anit

Kanhaiya Lal Taleja v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiya Lal Taleja v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrityunjay Singh Alias Mrityunjay Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Devdas Giri Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sikesh Yadav Alias Sikesh Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sitaram Saw Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ganesh Prasad Verma Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sajalendu Guha Roy Vs State of Jharkhand Thr. C.B.I.