Allowed

Ajay Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC16 Aug 2022A.B.A./2770/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand allowed an application for anticipatory bail filed by Ajay Kumar. The petitioner was apprehending arrest in a case involving allegations of harassment, Bigamy, and kidnapping. The Court granted bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail; release on bail upon arrest/surrender within two weeks subject to bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and compliance with Cr.P.C. conditions.

Ajay Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand — Dowry and Cruelty | Jharkhand HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A. B. A. No. 2770 of 2022

¶3

Ajay Kumar . .... .. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand. 2.Bebi Devi .. ... ...Opp. Party(s)

¶4

........... CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶5

For the Petitioner : Mr. S. K. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, APP For the O. P. NO.2 : Ms. Khushboo Kumari, Advocate

¶6

06/ 16.08.2022 . Apprehending his arrest, petitioner abovenamed has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Daltonganj Mahila P. S. Case No.31 of 2021 for the offence registered under Sections 498A/ 494/ 379/ 323/ 504/ 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 /4 of D. P. Act.

¶7

Heard the parties.

¶8

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the marriage in between both parties took place on 27.04.2016. It is further submitted that the allegation of extra-marital relationship is false and fabricated and there is no allegation for the offence under Section 498A IPC.

¶9

Learned APP for the State assisted by learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 has opposed the prayer. It is submitted that when the informant raised voice against her harassment, the petitioner performed second marriage.

¶10

Considering the submissions of learned counsel and the fact as discussed above, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of two weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner named above shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶11

The petitioner will co-operate in the investigation and will appear on notice under Section 41 A of Cr.P.C. and comply with the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶12

Sandeep/

Ajay Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandan Dutta Vs the State of Jharkhand

Badal Vishwakarma Vs the State of Jharkhand

Aminuddin Ansari Alias Amruddin Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Mrityunjay Singh Alias Mrityunjay Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Devdas Giri Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sikesh Yadav Alias Sikesh Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand