In a contempt application, the court held that the opposite parties complied with the prior order dated 10.06.2019 in W.P.(S). No. 1362 of 2019 and dismissed the petition, dropping the contempt proceedings.
Contempt application dismissed and dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (C). No. 246 of 2020
Dr. Md. Tahir Hussain …….. Petitioner
Versus
…….. Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK (Through: Video Conferencing)
-------For the Petitioner : Md. Jalisur Rahman, Advocate For Opp. Parties : Ms. Soumya S. Pandey, AC to GP Dr. A.K. Singh, Advocate
05/ 17.12.2021 It has been submitted by learned counsel for the opposite parties that the order dated 10.06.2019, passed in W.P.(S). No. 1362 of 2019, has already been complied with.
In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, no contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, it is dropped
Resultantly, the contempt application stands disposed of.
Kunal/
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
Dr. Md. Tahir Hussain
The State of Jharkhand
Sri Shailesh Kumar Singh
Sri Dinesh Prasad
Prof. Mrs. Sonajharia Minz
Sri Dr. Dhurva Narayan Singh
S. N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
