The High Court of Jharkhand considered a contempt petition where counsel for the opposite party submitted that the court's order directing reinstatement had been complied with. The court held no case for contempt existed and dropped the proceedings.
The contempt proceeding against the petitioners is dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. (Cvl.) Case No. 452 of 2021
Birsa Singh
…. Petitioner
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N.PATHAK (Through: Video Conferencing)
For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Prem Pujari, AC to SC For JEPC : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate
04/ 17.12.2021 Learned counsel for the opposite party-JEPC submits that order of this Hon’ble Court dated 08.08.2019 passed in W.P.(S) No.4962 of 2016 has already been complied with as petitioner has already been reinstated in services.
In view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the opposite parties, no case for contempt is made out as the order of this Court has already been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt proceeding is dropped.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
Punit/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether contempt proceeding is maintainable when the impugned order has been complied with.
Birsa Singh
The State of Jharkhand
Shri Rahul Sharma
Shri Vinod Anugrah Minj
Shri Kamlesh Kumar Singh
Dr. S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
