A single-line order disposing of a contempt application where the respondent submitted that a previous order was complied with, thus preventing contempt findings.
Contempt application dropped; petitioner at liberty to challenge the reasoned order from lower court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (C). No. 607 of 2019
Versus
…….. Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK (Through: Video Conferencing)
-------For the Petitioners : Mr. Saurabh Shekhar, Advocate For Opp. Parties : Mr. Prem Pujari Roy, AC to SC
In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, no
contempt is made out against the opposite parties and hence, it is dropped
Resultantly, the contempt application stands disposed of.
However, petitioners are at liberty to challenge the reasoned order, if at all aggrieved by the same.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
Kunal/
Hirdya Nand Singh and others
The State of Jharkhand
Mrs. Pooja Singhal
Mrs. Suchitra Sinha
Mr. Santanu Kumar Agrahari
S. N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
