Allowed

Mukesh Turi v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC15 Jul 2021A.B.A./583/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition under Section 498A IPC, the court granted bail contingent on the petitioner resuming conjugal life and maintaining the wife with dignity. The petitioner was directed to surrender and follow specific undertakings pending the appearance of the informant.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail subject to undertaking to resume conjugal life and maintain the wife with dignity; surrender directed.

Mukesh Turi Vs the State of Jharkhand — Dowry and Cruelty | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 583 of 2020

¶2

Mukesh Turi … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. … Opposite Parties

¶3

------

¶4

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶5

For the Petitioner : Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Addl. P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate

¶6

------

¶7

Order No.06 Dated- 15.07.2021

¶8

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶9

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No.218 of 2014 registered under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the informant-opposite party no.2 jointly submits that both the petitioner and the informant-opposite party no.2 are ready and willing to resume their conjugal life. It is next submitted that the petitioner and the informant-opposite party no.2, in person, will appear before the trial court on 3^rd August, 2021 and the petitioner will take the informant-opposite party no.2 to his house with an undertaking that he will keep and maintain the informant-opposite party no.2 with full dignity and honour as his lawful wife. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶11

Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State has no serious objection.

¶12

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate-1^st Class, Deoghar on 3^rd August, 2021 and on that day on his taking the informant-opposite party no.2 to his house with an undertaking that

¶13

he will keep and maintain the informant-opposite party no.2 with full honour and dignity as his lawful wife, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1^st Class, Deoghar in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No.218 of 2014 with the condition that he will continue to keep and maintain the complainant-opposite party no.2 as his lawful wife with full dignity and honour and other conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶14

It is made clear that in case the informant-opposite party no.2 does not appear before the trial court on 3^rd August, 2021, still the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1^st Class, Deoghar in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No.218 of 2014 with the condition that he will resume conjugal life with the informant-opposite party no.2 as and when the informant-opposite party no.2 joins him for resuming the conjugal life and the petitioner will keep and maintain her with full dignity and honour as his lawful wife and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶15

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶16

Sonu/Gunjan-

Mukesh Turi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Turi v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uttam Singh Alias Uttam Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Nitay Kumar Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ram Prasad Sao Vs the State of Jharkhand

Naina Jhari Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Arun Agarwala Alias Arun Kumar Bakrewalla Vs the State of Jharkhand

Praveen Kumar Upadhyay Vs the State of Jharkhand