Allowed

Ram Prasad Sao v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC14 Jul 2021A.B.A./4798/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a single bench order, the High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing charges under Sections 379 and 411 IPC related to illegal transportation of stone chips. The court directed surrender within six weeks and imposed conditions regarding security deposit, cooperation, and mobile number maintenance.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was granted privileges of anticipatory bail directed to surrender within six weeks, with enlargement on bail upon depositing Rs.10,000 cash security and furnishing a bond of Rs.25,000 w

Ram Prasad Sao Vs the State of Jharkhand — Anticipatory Bail | Jharkhand HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.4798 of 2020

¶2

------

¶3

Ram Prasad Sao .... .... …. Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party

¶6

------

¶7

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶8

For the Petitioner : Ms. Rashmi Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabir Kr. Chatterjee, Addl.P.P

¶9

Order No.03 Dated- 14.07.2021

¶10

Heard the parties through video conferencing.

¶11

Apprehending his arrest in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No.31 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No.116 of 2013 instituted under Sections 379, 411 of the Indian Penal Code and J.M.M. 2004 Rules 54 Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of a tractor which was seized by police while being used for illegal transportation of stone chips. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-03 of the supplementary affidavit, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that the petitioner had no knowledge about his vehicle being involved in any illegal activity. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶13

Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶14

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court of learned C.J.M., Koderma within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

¶15

to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Koderma in connection with Koderma P.S. Case No.31 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No.116 of 2013 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶17

Animesh/

Ram Prasad Sao v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Prasad Sao v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Yadav Vs the State of Jharkhand

Vijay Kumar Ram Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bimal Ranjan Tigga Vs the State of Jharkhand

Uttam Singh Alias Uttam Kumar Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Nitay Kumar Mandal Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Hasibullah Vs the State of Jharkhand