would not be entitled to continue as Para Teachers and their services would be terminated forthwith. He further draws attention to Annexure 7, which is the office order of Jharkhand Academic Council, which is the regulatory body up till 12th standard and from the said office order it transpires that the Council has recognized the ‘Madhyama’ certificate of the “Hindi Sahitya Sammelan similar to Intermediate certificate”. By referring to all these letters annexed with the writ application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent authority has acted arbitrarily by not considering the certificate of “Hindi Sahitya Sammelan, Prayag” and terminated the petitioner because admittedly the certificate of the petitioner was of the year 2007 and as per the letters of the respondent Department, decision was taken in the year 2008 that all those Para Teachers who are not having intermediate pass certificate will be terminated accordingly. Learned counsel further referred to the judgment passed in L.P.A. No. 117 of 2012 filed by one Sita Ram Manjhi, who was similarly situated person and his name appears in Serial No.1 of the impugned order (Annexure 3); and the said appeal was decided in favour of the said appellant- Sita Ram Manjhi. 4. Learned counsel for the State reiterated the stand taken in the counter affidavit.
