4. Aggrieved with the same, the appellants/plaintiffs filed the title appeal being Title Appeal No.160 of 2006 which was decided vide judgment dated 18.12.2015 by the District Judge-VI, Dhanbad. The appellate court also discussed the evidences and documents and found that the Title Suit No.156 of 2004 was filed subsequent to Title (P) Suit No.83 of 1986 by the Prayag Mahato & Ors., are appellants/plaintiffs. Smt. Adi Mahatain and her vendees are defendants in which, plaintiffs with a pleading that Plot Nos.175, 320, 327 & 322, of Khata No.44, Mouza 91 Mouza Nahtamurcha, belongs to Muchiram Teli who sold it to his two daughters namely Radhiya Mahatain and Adiya Mahatain vide sale deed no.4720 dated 12.03.1970 and subsequently Radhiya Mahatain and Adiya Mahatain sold 72 decimals in Plot No.327 to mother of plaintiff Akli Mahatain. The cause which compel the plaintiffs to bring the present suit was execution of sale deed no.4734 dated 06.07.2004 by which Adiya Mahatian sold 70 decimals of Plot No.175, 320, 327 and 322 to defendant nos.1 and 2. The cause of action as started by appellants/plaintiffs is that Adiya Mahatain had already sold her entire interest in Plot No.327 to Akli Mahtain so, she had no interest in Plot No.327 which she could have sold to defendant nos.1 and 2.
