Revision filed to challenge discharge rejection in a corruption case. Dismissed due to non-appearance and non-prosecution by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Criminal Revision No.1398 of 2015
Rameshwar Jha … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance … Opp. Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --For the Petitioner : None For the State : Mr. T.N. Verma, Adv. ---
11/20.01.2020 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner.
“This revision application has been filed for challenging the legality, propriety and correctness of the order dated 17.08.2015, passed in Spl. Case No.14/2014, corresponding to Vigilance P.S. Case No.13/2014, by learned Spl. Judge, Vigilance, Ranchi whereby the petition filed by the petitioner, for discharge has erroneously been rejected and it was observed that there are sufficient materials available on record for framing of the charges as against the petitioner u/s 7/13(2) r/w Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.”
2
dismissed as not pressed.
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Saurav/
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rameshwar Jha
The State of Jharkhand through Vigilance
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
