Criminal miscellaneous petition filed for quashing criminal proceedings quiesced by the petitioners who sought to withdraw their petition with liberty to raise remaining points before the court below; the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P. No. 320 of 2012
CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY
--For the Petitioner s : Mr. Ashutosh Anand, Advocate For the C.B.I. : Mr. B. K. Prasad, Advocate ---
18 /18.01.2020
1. This petition has been filed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding including the F.I.R. in R.C. No. 02(A)/2012-R dated 06.01.2012 registered under section 120B, 420, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 13(2), read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which is said to be pending in the court of learned Special Judge, Central Bureau of Investigation, Ranchi.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. Ashutosh Anand, on instructions from his clients, seeks permission to withdraw this petition with a liberty to raise all the points that have been raised in the present petition as well as the points that may be available to the petitioners as per law, before the learned court below at appropriate stage.
3. Learned counsel for the C.B.I. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
4. Considering the submissions made, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty
2
to the petitioners to raise all the points which are available to them under law at appropriate stage before the learned court below. It is made clear that dismissal of this petition will not prejudice the case of either parties before the learned court below in any manner whatsoever.
5. Pending interlocutory application, if any, is dismissed as not pressed.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court below through ‘FAX’
(Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.)
Pankaj
Manoj Kumar Singh
Binod Kumar Singh
The Union of India
The Central Bureau of Investigation
The Deputy Superintendent of Police
The Sub Inspector of Police cum Investigating Officer
Anubha Rawat Choudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
