In three contempt applications filed under analogous Civil Cases, the Court examined a compliance order dated 19.08.2019 passed by the Director, Primary Education. Finding the order complied with previous judgments, the Court held no case for contempt was made out and disposed of the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 262 of 2018
-Versus-
… … …Opp. Parties
With
Cont. Case (Civil) No.318 of 2018
Md. Nasimuddin. … …Petitioner
-Versus-
With
Cont. Case (Civil) No.524 of 2018
Vinay Kumar Singh. … … …Petitioner
-Versus-
With
Cont. Case (Civil) No.261 of 2018
-Versus-
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK
-------For the Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kr. Tiwari, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr. R.P. Sinha, A.C. to (L&C) I Miss Sunita Kumari, A.C. to (L&C) III. --------
Order No.09: Dated: 24th January, 2020
Per Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.:
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
MM
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners had made out a case for contempt of court regarding the order passed by the Director, Primary Education dated 19.08.2019.
Whether the order passed by the Director, Primary Education dated 19.08.2019 constituted a compliance of the direction issued by this Court on 14.12.2017.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(S) No. 502 of 2016Referred¶53
Anant Kumar and others
Md. Nasimuddin
Vinay Kumar Singh
Wakil Prasad Chourasia and others
The State of Jharkhand and others
Dr. S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
