Dharmendra Kumar v. the State of Jharkhand
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A . No. 9112…
What did the court decide?
Four months extension of time to conclude the trial to the Additional Sessions Judge-III, Giridih.
COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A . No. 9112…
Four months extension of time to conclude the trial to the Additional Sessions Judge-III, Giridih.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9112 of 2020
Dharmendra Kumar … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy , Adv. For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar ,Addl. P.P.
03 / 09.07.2021
Heard the parties through video conferencing.
The record is put up today as the report is received from the Additional Sessions Judge-III, Giridih wherein, the learned Judge prayed for six months extension of time for concluding the trial and so far, he has already examined six witnesses.
In view of the said report, four months extension is allowed to the learned Judge from the date of receipt of copy of this order to conclude the trial.
( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Smita/-
Dharmendra Kumar
The State of Jharkhand
Anil Kumar Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court