Order permitting withdrawal of an application filed by the petitioner against the State of Jharkhand. Permission granted after addressing specific defects in the application.
Permission to withdraw the application accorded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2489 of 2020
Narendra Kumar
… ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY
-------For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shekhar Sinha, A.P.P.
Order No. 02: Dated: 3rd September, 2020
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.
So far as defect no. 9(i) is concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the same once the situation normalizes. As regards defect no. 2 is concerned, the same is ignored.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction from his client,
seeks permission to withdraw this application.
Learned A.P.P. does not have any objection.
Permission is accorded.
This application, accordingly, is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)
MM
Narendra Kumar
State of Jharkhand
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
