Allowed

Brij Mohan Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC2 Sept 2020B.A./1380/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants bail to the petitioner, an accused in cyber cheating charges under IPC and IT Act. The court noted that the main accused had been granted bail, the principal amount was returned via compromise with the informant, and the petitioner was already in custody for over a year.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount.

Brij Mohan Prasad Vs the State of Jharkhand — Cheating and Forgery | Jharkhand HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

B.A. No. 1380 of 2020

¶3

Brij Mohan Prasad … ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. … … Nitin Kumar Singh Opp. Parties

¶4

¶5

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY

¶6

-------For the Petitioner : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Spl.P.P. --------

¶7

Order No. 05: Dated: 2^nd September, 2020

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.

¶9

The petitioner is an accused in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 10 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under sections 419, 420, 468 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 66(C) and 66 (D) of the Information Act.

¶10

Earlier in this case notice was ordered to be issued to the opposite party no. 2 but neither the service report nor the A/D has yet returned.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner filed a supplementary affidavit from which it appears that the notice has been served through mail to the informant. However, in spite of the said facts none appears for the opposite party no. 2 (informant).

¶12

It has been alleged that the informant was seduced by a caller named Kaya Malhotra and on the inducement of giving sexual favour communication was established between the informant and Kaya Malthora and subsequent thereto an amount of Rs. 33,00,000/- was transferred to different accounts given by Kaya Malhotra and Dipti Singh. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been made an accused being an associate of the main accused Amit Diwan who was the master mind behind such incident and in fact the matter between Amit Diwan and informant was compromised before the mediation centre and an amount of Rs. 38,00,000/- was returned to the informant. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is in custody since 24.06.2018.

¶13

Learned Spl. P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and has submitted that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent which, however, has been denied by the counsel for the petitioner also stated that an inference has been drawn regarding the antecedent of the petitioner on the basis of the confessional statement rendered by the petitioner.

¶14

The aforesaid facts, therefore, indicate that the informant has returned back the amount pursuant to the compromise and main accused Amit Diwan has been granted bail by learned court below on 23.07.2019. The petitioner as stated above is already in custody since 24.06.2018.

¶15

Regard being had to the period of custody, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-II, Ranchi, in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No. 10 of 2019.

¶16

(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.)

¶17

Brij Mohan Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Brij Mohan Prasad v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kriahna Mohan Dubey Vs the State of Jharkhand

Gumani Rabidas Vs the State of Jharkhand

Rajesh Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Suresh Singh Alias Surya Prasad Rai Alias Surya Prasad Alias Surya Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

MD Sarfaraj Alam Vs the State of Jharkhand

Manoj Kumar Alias Manoj Kumar Singh Vs Directorate of Enforcement