Petitioner in bail application alleged trafficking and(false marriage). Court declined to entertain application at this stage given nature of allegations regarding trafficking and forced sale of victims.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B. A. No. 2302 of 2020
Lal Bahadur @ Chhote Lal … … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party ---
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---
For the Petitioner : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mrs. Lily Sahay, A.P.P.
3/03.07.2020 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is an accused in connection with Bermo P.S. Case No. 3 of 2019 corresponding to G. R. No. 36 2019.
It has been alleged that the wife of the informant and her two children were taken to Uttar Pradesh by the accused persons and she was sold to the petitioner for Rs. 43,000/-. In the statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. of the victim, she has stated that she was forcibly got married to the petitioner.
Regard being had to the nature of allegations, I am not inclined to allow this application and the same is hereby rejected at this stage.
(Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J)
R. Shekhar Cp 3
Lal Bahadur @ Chhote Lal
Rongon Mukhopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court