The petitioner died during the pendency of the writ petition. With the consent of parties, the court disposed of the petition, granting liberty to the legal heirs to file a fresh writ challenging the impugned orders.
Writ petition disposed of; liberty to legal heirs to file fresh writ if advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S.) No. 6378 of 2009
Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma, son of Late Tota Mistri
… ... Petitioner
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-------For the Petitioner : Mr. Dipankar Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate Miss. Pooja Kumari, Advocate
Order No. 10: Dated: 19th July, 2019
Per Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.:
legal heirs of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.)
MM
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be disposed of given the death of the petitioner and the decision of the pending appeal.
Whether legal heirs of the petitioner should be permitted to file a fresh writ petition challenging the challenged orders.
Ashok Kumar Vishwakarma
Central Coalfields Limited
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
