The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of a writ petition where no petitioner appeared and respondent counsel submitted the dispute was settled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5481 of 2006
M/s Novelty Bar & Restaurant, Bistupur, Jamshedpur through one of its partners … … Petitioner
Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : None For the Respondent No. 3 : Mr. D.K. Karmakar, Advocate
-----
09/06.11.2019 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Mr. D.K. Karmakar, the learned counsel for the respondent no. 3, on instruction, submits that the dispute raised in the present writ petition has been settled between the parties.
In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent no. 3, there is no reason to further proceed in the present writ petition. The same is accordingly disposed of.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Manish
M/s Novelty Bar & Restaurant, Bistupur, Jamshedpur through one of its partners
State of Jharkhand
Commissioner, Kolhan Division, Chaibasa
Adil K. Gajdar
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
