The petitioner failed to appear despite repeated calls regarding a writ petition filed in 2009. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and vacated any interim orders.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(C) No. 1216 of 2009
Suman Cathrine Kispotta …Petitioner
-V e r s u s-
...Respondents
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : - None For Resp.no. 3 :- Mr. P.A. Khan, Advocate
06/06.11.2019
No one appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated
calls.
Earlier also on 03.07.2019, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the case was adjourned.
Since the present writ petition pertains to the year 2009 and no one has been appearing on behalf of the petitioner to press the same,
I see no reason to keep the writ petition pending.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
The interim order, if any, stands vacated.
I.A. No. 183 of 2010 also stands dismissed.
Ritesh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition filed in 2009 should be allowed to remain pending given the petitioner's consistent absence for over a decade.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suman Cathrine Kispotta
The Jharkhand State Information Commission, Ranchi
Ramchandra Sah
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
