Petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Consequently, the High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the petition on that ground without detailed reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4967 of 2009
Bhujender Rawani
… … Petitioner
Versus
… … Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rahul Lamba, Advocate -----
06/05.11.2019 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer made by the petitioner in the present writ petition has now become infructuous.
In view of the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Manish
Bhujender Rawani
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
Nirbhay Charan Lal
Rajesh Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
