Gokul Mahto v. Most Rango Devi And Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous writ petition. Petitioner sought withdrawal as underlying Title Appeal was disposed of. Court accepted submission and disposed of W.P.
Infructuous writ petition. Petitioner sought withdrawal as underlying Title Appeal was disposed of. Court accepted submission and disposed of W.P.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. I.A. No. 576 of 2018
with
W.P. (C) No. 4402 of 2017
Gokul Mahto … … Petitioner -V e r s u s-
1.Most. Rango Devi 2.Sri Ram Mahto, 3.Baijnath Mahto, 4.Deo Nath Mahto, 5.Shyamli Devi, 6.Rajesh Mahto, 7.Pradhan Mahto, 8.Sarla Devi, 9.Amar Nath Mahto, 10.Bahadur Mahto, 11.Chamar Mahto, 12.Lilabati Mahto, 13.Birla, 14.Roso Bala, 15.Satya Devi, 16.Anjana Devi, 17.Bimla Devi, 18.Chandra Mohan Mahto, 19.Jalo Devi, 20.Lakhia Mahto, 21.Keshav Mahto, 22.Yogeshwar Mahto, 23.Kirti Mahto, 24.Most Menka Devi, 25.Amar Mahto, 26.Tusuwa Mahto, 27.Muni Devi, 28.Mini Devi, 29.Duro Devi.
… Respondents.
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
… For the Petitioner : - Mr. Kundan Kumar Ambastha, Advocate. For the Respondents :- Mr. S. K. Sahay, Advocate.
07/10.06.2019 Mr. Kundan Kumar Ambastha, learned counsel appearing for
the petitioner at the outset has submitted that since the Title Appeal itself has been disposed of, therefore, the order, which is impugned in this writ petition, which has been passed in the aforesaid Title Appeal, hence after its disposal, the writ petition has become infructuous.
In view thereof, he has prayed to withdraw this writ petition.
Mr. S. K. Sahay, learned counsel appearing for the Respondents had also submitted that the Title Appeal has been disposed of.
In view thereof and considering the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is rendered to be infructuous and accordingly, disposed of.
Consequently, I.A. No. 576 of 2018 also stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
APK
Gokul Mahto
Rango Devi
Sri Ram Mahto
Baijnath Mahto
Deo Nath Mahto
Shyamli Devi
SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court