Piyush Sharma v. Transport
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner's application for a permanent permit had already been disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. I.A. No. 572 of 2013
with
W.P. (S) No. 4117 of 2012
Piyush Sharma … … Petitioner
-V e r s u s-
1.The State of Jharkhand through its Principal Secretary, Department of Transport, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.
2.Secretary, Department of Transport, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.
3.State Transport Authority, Jharkhand, through its Chairman.
… Respondents.
CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY.
… For the Petitioner : - Mr. Mitul Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondent-State: - Ms. Kanchan Kumari, A.C. to A.A.G. II.
04/04.09.2019 Mr. Mitul Kumar learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset submits that the application preferred by the petitioner for grant of permanent permit has already been disposed of and therefore, this writ petition has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Piyush Sharma
- respondent
The State of Jharkhand through its Principal Secretary, Department of Transport, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi
- respondent
Secretary, Department of Transport, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi
- respondent
State Transport Authority, Jharkhand, through its Chairman
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Jharkhand HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPC/4117/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court