The Court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition. As the application was withdrawn by the petitioner with the respondents' consent, the writ petition was dismissed.
Permission granted for withdrawal of the writ application; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P.(S).No. 1356 of 2019
Laxman Mahto … … Petitioner
... … Respondents
CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N.PATHAK
For the Petitioner : Mr. Piyush Kant Choudhary, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ankit Vishal, Advocate
03/ 11.07.2019 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of instant writ application.
Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the said
withdrawal.
Permission, as sought for, is granted.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.)
kunal/-
Laxman Mahto
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., Dhanbad
Project Officer, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., Kharkharee Colliery
Dr. S.N. Pathak
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
