Appeal dismissed as infructuous because the underlying Title Suit No. 38 of 2009 had already been decided, as submitted by counsel for the parties.
The appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
M.A. No. 44 of 2011
Tajim Ansari & Anr..…....... Appellants
Versus
Sahadul Mian& Ors………… Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen
For the Appellants : Mr. R.C.Sahu, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Abhay Kr. Mishra, Advocate
8/19.07.2019 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of both the parties submits that Title Suit No. 38 of 2009, has already been decided.
In view of the said submission, this appeal, challenging the interlocutory order passed in Title Suit No. 38 of 2009, has become infructuous.
Accordingly, it is dismissed as infructuous.
( Ananda Sen, J )
Mukund/-cp.2
Tajem Ansari
Sahadul Mian
Ananda Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
