The High Court dismissed the petitioner's application as withdrawn, noting the State's lack of objection and granting liberty to raise points at an appropriate stage.
Application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to adjudicate all points at an appropriate stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. M.P. No. 285 of 2015
…..
Shailesh Kishore Sinha, s/o Nawal Kishore Sinha, resident of flat no. 301, Bansal Plaza, phase 2, old HB road, PO Chutia, P.S. Chutia, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.
…… Petitioner
Versus
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO
----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashant Pallav, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : A.P.P
…….
06/04.02.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present application so as to avail the legal remedy available to him at an appropriate stage.
Learned counsel for the State has no objection.
Considering the same, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to adjudicate all the points available before him at an appropriate stage.
(Kailash Prasad Deo, J.)
Pallavi/
Shailesh Kishore Sinha
The State of Jharkhand
Sunil Kumar Choudhary
KAILASH PRASAD DEO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
