In this Cr.M.P., the petitioner submitted that parties had settled their dispute and filed a mutual consent divorce petition. The High Court dismissed the appeal seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail based on this submission.
The Cr.M.P. filed for cancellation of anticipatory bail was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1434 of 2019
Pallavi ….. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ….. Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalan Kr. Singh, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee, Adv.
06/Dated: 06/12/2019
Today, when the case is called out, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the parties have settled their dispute out side the court and filed a divorce petition with mutual consent under Section 13(B) of the Cr. P.C.
In view of the submission, this Cr.M.P filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. with a prayer for cancellation of anticipatory bail, is hereby dismissed.
(Anant Bijay Singh, J.)
fahim/
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Cr.M.P. to cancel anticipatory bail should be dismissed upon submission that parties have settled and filed for mutual consent divorce.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Pallavi
The State of Jharkhand
Anant Bijay Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
