The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of a contempt case, permitting the opposite parties to file an affidavit and allowing the petitioner to challenge the subsequent order. Proceedings were dropped.
Proceedings are dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No.755 of 2019
Pitambar Mahto …… Petitioner
Versus
-----
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR
For the Petitioner :Mr. Afaque Ahmed, Adv. For the Opp. Parties :Mr. Navin Kr. Singh, Adv. ----
04/Dated: 22/11/2019
It has been submitted that in compliance of the order, a reasoned order has already been passed.
Learned counsel for the opposite parties is permitted to file an affidavit in course of the day.
Petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law.
With the above observation and directions, the present contempt case is disposed of and proceedings are dropped.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.)
Shahid/
Pitambar Mahto
State of Jharkhand
Chhathu Vijay Singh
Rajesh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
