Allowed

Khalid Bin Israil v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC2 May 2019A.B.A./76/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in proceedings under Section 498-A IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, directing surrender and depositing an interim compensation of Rs. 25,000 as a condition of release.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to surrender, deposit of Rs. 25,000 as interim victim compensation, and furnishing of bail bond with sureties.

Khalid Bin Israil Vs the State of Jharkhand — Domestic Violence | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.76 of 2019

¶2

------

¶3

Khalid Bin Israil .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shabana Parveen .... .... .... Opposite Parties

¶4

------

¶5

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶6

------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kr. Bharti, Advocate For the State : Addl.P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : None

¶7

Order No.06 Dated- 02.05.2019

¶8

Apprehending his arrest in connection with P.C. No.77 of 2016 instituted under Sections 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶9

Though notice was issued to the opposite party No.2 yet no one appears on her behalf in spite of repeated calls.

¶10

Heard the parties.

¶11

Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and general and omnibus in nature. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay ad interim victim compensation of Rs.25,000/- without prejudice to his defence in this case in favour of the opposite party No.2 namely- Shabana Parveen. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.

¶12

Learned Addl.P.P appearing for the State being assisted by the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶13

Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court of learned J.M., 1^st Class, Seraikella within four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, the petitioner will be enlarged on bail on depositing a demand draft of Rs.25,000/- as ad interim victim compensation without prejudice to his defence in this case drawn in favour of the opposite party No.2 namely- Shabana Parveen and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction

¶14

of learned J.M., 1^st Class, Seraikella in connection with P.C. No.77 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶15

In case the petitioner deposits the said demand draft, the court below is directed to issue notice to the opposite party No.2 namely- Shabana Parveen and on her proper identification, the court below shall handover the same to her forthwith.

¶16

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J . )

¶17

Animesh/

Khalid Bin Israil v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khalid Bin Israil v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Islam Ansar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Bablu Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Boby Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sweta Rajgarhia Alias Swata Raigharia Vs the State of Jharkhand

Sibghatullah Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Barun Pradhan Vs the State of Jharkhand