Allowed

Bablu Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC1 May 2019A.B.A./304/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi granted anticipatory bail to Bablu Singh in a case involving Sections 498A, 494, and 323 IPC. The court ordered that upon arrest or surrender within four weeks, he shall be released on bail upon depositing Rs. 25,000 as interim victim compensation and furnishing a bail bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail contingent upon deposit of Rs. 25,000 as interim victim compensation and furnishing bail bond with two sureties within four weeks.

Bablu Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand — Dowry and Cruelty | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B. A. No. 304 of 2019

¶3

Bablu Singh … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. … Opposite Parties

¶4

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶5

For the Petitioner : Mr. J. N. Upadhyay, Adv. For the State : Addl. P.P. For Opposite Party No. 2 : Mr. R. Agarwal, Adv.

¶6

04 / 01.05.2019 Heard the parties. Both the parties are present in the court

¶7

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with P.C. Case No. 239 of 2016 registered under Sections 498A/494/323 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶8

It is jointly submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 that there is no chance of settlement between the petitioner and opposite party no.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations against the petitioner are false and those allegations are general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay Rs. 25,000/- as ad interim victim compensation to the complainant without prejudice to his defence, hence, the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶9

The learned Addl. PP and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 oppose the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶10

Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Hence, in the event of arrest by the police or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, the petitioner shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 25,000/- by way of demand draft drawn in favour of complainant as ad interim victim compensation and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of

¶11

the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. at Saraikella in connection with P.C. Case No. 239 of 2016 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C.

¶12

In case of depositing aforesaid demand draft by the petitioner, learned court below is directed to issue notice to the complainant and release the demand draft in her favour on proper identification forthwith.

¶13

( ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)

¶14

Smita/Rajnish-

Bablu Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bablu Singh v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjib Kumar Singh Alias Sanjib Samanta Vs the State of Jharkhand

Anand Raut Alias Anand Kumar Raut Vs the State of Jharkhand

Kailash Nonia Alias Kailash Chouhan Vs the State of Jharkhand

Islam Ansar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Boby Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand

Laldeo Oraon Vs the State of Jharkhand