Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their bail application. TheState opined as acceptable. Allowed; bail application dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the bail application was accorded and the application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2344 of 2019
Versus
The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
For the Petitioners : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sinha, A.P.P.
-----
02/02.08.2019 Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate under instruction of Mr. Gautam Kumar, the learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the present bail application.
The learned A.P.P. has no objection to the same. Permission is accorded. The bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.
Manish
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
Babudhan Soren
Birju Tudu
The State of Jharkhand
RAJESH SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
