The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the written statement application. The court granted permission and dismissed the application as withdrawn, concomitantly disposing of the connected interim application.
Permission to withdraw the application granted; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.R. No.38 of 2015
With
I.A. No.3896 of 2015
Pankaj Kumar Pahari
..... Petitioner
Versus
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA
For the Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Keshri, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Ayush Aditya, Advocate
-----
9/9.5.2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
This application is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the pending I.A. No.3896 of 2015 also stands disposed of.
(H. C. Mishra, J.)
R.Kumar
Pankaj Kumar Pahari
Sukumar Goswami
Shyamal Goswami
H.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
