Allowed

Jahur Alam Sheikh Alias MD Jahur Alam v. the State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand HC13 Feb 2019A.B.A./317/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Taljhari P.S. Case No. 107 of 2018涉及 Section 414 IPC and animal protection statutes, subject to deposit of security and specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted privilege of anticipatory bail; in event of arrest or surrender within four weeks, released on bail on depositing Rs. 20,000/- cash and furnishing Rs. 25,000/- bond with two suretie

Jahur Alam Sheikh Alias MD Jahur Alam Vs the State of… — Cheque Dishonour | Jharkhand HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

¶2

A.B.A. No. 317 of 2019

¶3

Jahur Alam Sheikh @ Md. Jahur Alam @ Jahur Alam Seikh … ... Petitioner

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --------

¶6

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY

¶7

¶8

For the Petitioner : Mr. G.K. Singh, Advocate For the State : Addl. P.P.

¶9

¶10

Order No. 04: Dated: 13^th February, 2019

¶11

Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Taljhari P.S. Case No. 107 of 2018 (G.R. No. 851 of 2018) for the offence registered under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 12 of the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, 2005 and Sections 11(D) (B) of The Cruelty to Animals Act, 1876.

¶12

Heard the parties.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle TATA 709, bearing registration no. JH-18F-6317 which was seized by the police for allegedly transporting bovine animals for slaughter. It is submitted that the petitioner was not present at the place of occurrence and he has no knowledge that his vehicle was involved in illegal activities. It is next submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation of the case and also willing to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶14

The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶15

Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that this is a fit case where the petitioner, named above, be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing Rs. 20,000/- as

¶16

cash security and furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Rajmahal in connection with Taljhari P.S. Case No. 107 of 2018 (G.R. No. 851 of 2018) subject to the condition laid down under section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions that:

¶17

I. the petitioner will co-operate with the investigation of the case,

¶18

II. the petitioner will appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed.

¶19

III. the petitioner will furnish his mobile phone numbers and copy of Aadhar Card by way of filing affidavit in the court below and will undertake that he will not change his mobile phone numbers during the pendency of this case.

¶20

If Investigating Officer requires mobile phone numbers of the petitioner, he can make appropriate prayer before the trial court and on such prayer being made the court below will provide mobile number of the petitioner to the Investigating Officer.

¶21

(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)

¶22

Jahur Alam Sheikh Alias MD Jahur Alam v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jahur Alam Sheikh Alias MD Jahur Alam v. the State of Jharkhand

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hamid Ansari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Suraj Kumar Yadav Alias Suraj Kumar Vs the State of Jharkhand

Ruplal Saw Alias Ruplala Sao Alias Rupu Sao Vs the State of Jharkhand

Arvind Tiwari Vs the State of Jharkhand

Narad Singh Vs the State of Jharkhand

Dulari Devi Vs the State of Jharkhand